Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs GPT-6 Luna

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek
GPT-6 LunaOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp	27/100	79/100	60/100	80/100	33/100	0/100
GPT-6 Luna	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	46/100	74/100	98/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

DeepSeek

OpenAI

Context length

1.1M

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text, Image, Pdf

Output modalities

Text

Providers

DeepSeek

OpenAI

Pricing

Input

$0.30/ 1M

$0.10/ 1M

Output

$1.20/ 1M

$0.50/ 1M

Cached input

$0.006/ 1M

$0.01/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

334K

160K

Completed sessions

971,038

1,069,665

Token share

0.93%

0.1%

Tokens

8.7T+100%

983B+100%

AUG 11OCT 5

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

62.1%24K user-weeks

71.9%1K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpJamba Mini Nearby alternativeGPT-6 Luna vs Jamba MiniGPT-6 LunaJamba Mini Related comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpJamba Large Related comparisonGPT-6 Luna vs Jamba LargeGPT-6 LunaJamba Large