GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  1. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek
  2. MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp27/10079/10060/10080/10033/1000/100
MiMo-V2.6-Pro47/100100/10063/10092/10067/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.47/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.94/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.005/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
334K
56K
Completed sessions
971,038
253,542
Token share
0.93%
0.11%
Tokens
8.7T+100%
1T+100%
AUG 11OCT 5
AUG 11OCT 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
62.1%24K user-weeks
59.3%1.3K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.